Real VoicesReal Voices

Genius Scientists Rejected an Old Earth! Here’s Why

Recommended Resource If you want to go deeper, I highly recommend the book In Six Days: Why 50 Scientists Choose to Believe in Creation: https://amzn.to/4qIdBfF (Exclusive Affiliate link) Were brilliant scientists really forced to abandon Genesis once science advanced? Is Young Earth Creationism Credible? Can science and religion coexist? In this video, I walk through a list of genius scientists—past and present—who rejected an old Earth and explain why they did so. From founders of modern science like Isaac Newton, Johannes Kepler, and Robert Boyle, to modern, credentialed scientists like Kurt Wise, Jason Lisle, and Andrew Snelling, this video challenges the assumption that belief in a young Earth is the result of ignorance or lack of education. For early scientists, the reason is simple: they took Scripture as their starting point at a time before modern old-earth theories even existed. For modern scientists, the reason is more striking: they are fully aware of the strongest arguments for an old Earth, trained at elite institutions, and yet still reject those conclusions—often at real professional cost—because they believe Scripture is authoritative and because they distinguish between observational science and historical interpretation. This video is not about running new experiments or claiming science has been “disproved.” It’s about removing a false barrier—the idea that faithfulness to Scripture requires intellectual compromise. Thank you to all the members of this channel. Special thanks to @djpodesta @marshallseaborn6214 @steve6452 @steeltoed Scripture referenced: Luke 24:25–27 — “Beginning at Moses and all the prophets, He expounded unto them in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself.” If you found this helpful, consider liking, sharing, and subscribing. And if you made it to the end, let me know in the comments by typing “Digging Deep!”

Scripture

LukeLuke 24Luke 24:25Luke 24:25-27

Topics

creationismcreation sciencechristian apologeticshistory of sciencereligion and science

More from Biblical Studies and Reviews, Stephen Hackett

View all

More like this