New Research May Confirm One of Genesis' Boldest Claims!

📖 Dr. Hebert's book → https://amzn.to/3S20BVK The Ice Age and Climate Change: A Creationist Perspective Young Earth creationists aren't just playing defense anymore — they're making testable scientific predictions and publishing peer-reviewed research. In this interview, Dr. Jake Hebert (PhD in Physics, UT Dallas) from the Institute for Creation Research joins us to break down the cutting-edge science behind the young Earth creation model. We dig into the creationist Ice Age model, why the famous "Pacemaker of the Ice Ages" paper may need to be retracted, the surprising link between Milankovitch theory and climate alarmism, fossil evidence for pre-flood animal longevity, and ICR's Continuous Environmental Tracking (CET) model as a creation-based alternative to Darwinian natural selection. If you made it to the end, type "Digging deep" in the comments to enter a giveaway for ICR's new documentary "On Thin Ice"! Some of the graphics were provided by Dr. Hebert. Many were my own. Any errors in graphics are mine, not the responsibility of Dr. Hebert or ICR. ⏱ TIMESTAMPS 00:00 – Young Earth Creation Is Going on Offense 05:28 – Do Ice Cores Really Disprove a Young Earth? 18:40 – The Deepest Argument in the Entire Debate 35:44 – The Antarctic Prediction That Shouldn't Exist 39:30 – The New Theory Challenging Random Mutation 44:55 – Fossil Evidence for Extreme Longevity? 📚 BOOKS The Ice Age & Climate Change (Hebert) → https://amzn.to/3S20BVK Scientific Creationism (Morris) → https://amzn.to/4uyuWbY Clearly Seen: Arguments for Design (Guliuzza) → https://amzn.to/4ovtNka Aware and Prepared (Guliuzza) → https://amzn.to/4v84iHR 📀 DVD On Thin Ice (ICR Store) → https://store.icr.org/on-thin-ice.html 📄 ICR ARTICLES Milankovitch Meltdown Pt. 1 → https://www.icr.org/article/milankovitch-meltdown-toppling-iconic Milankovitch Meltdown Pt. 2 → https://www.icr.org/article/9696 Milankovitch Meltdown Pt. 3 → https://www.icr.org/article/9752 CET Model Overview → https://www.icr.org/cet 🔬 PEER-REVIEWED PAPERS (Answers Research Journal) Should "Pacemaker of the Ice Ages" Be Retracted? Pt. 1 → https://answersresearchjournal.org/pacemaker-ice-ages-paper-retracted-1/ Should "Pacemaker of the Ice Ages" Be Retracted? Pt. 2 → https://answersresearchjournal.org/pacemaker-ice-ages-paper-retracted-2/ Should "Pacemaker of the Ice Ages" Be Retracted? Pt. 3 → https://answersresearchjournal.org/pacemaker-ice-ages-paper-retracted-3/ Official Giveaway Rules: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MWMzGunt_tetLCrjW7zk5y8B4DYkMx4D/view?usp=sharing Special shout out to these members: @ricky3905 @steve6452 @marshallseaborn6214 @djpodesta @marshallseaborn6214 @ElaineBenavidez-q2b @carlrozitis4563 Thank you Clint Loveness ​for helping so much with this. Correction: At 7:59 on the screen there is a typo that says 850,000 and should say 85,000.