Why the Evolution Debate Might Be Asking the Wrong Question

Dr. JT Bridges explains that much of the Intelligent Design vs. Neo-Darwinism debate assumes Darwinism must be either literally true or false. But what if that assumption is mistaken? Drawing on philosophy of science, he argues that Neo-Darwinism may function more like an empirical construct, where the assumptions of the framework shape how scientists interpret the data. This perspective opens the door to thinking about the origins debate in an entirely different way. #FaithAndScience #IntelligentDesign #ChristianWorldview