Lloyd#11: Muslims are ALL obligated to DOMINATE US!

Lloyd De Jongh’s Complete Archives can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxzjLOQlFjElsEXyuW-XrsAnXW9g70palt Lloyd now moves into one of the strongest injunctions of Shariah, that which is best known as "Commanding the Right and Forbidding the Wrong". According to a well known Arabic phrase, "Al-Wala wal-Bara" Muslim are to Hate anything and anyone who stands against Islam, and its prophet. This phrase can also mean "Loyalty and Disavowal", or "loving and hating". In the Sha'afi manual, "Reliance of the Traveler", Book Q, it points out that Muslims, in order to 'Command that which is right', are obliged to tell people what to do, and it splits it up into 2 categories of obligations: 1) Fard al Ain = Personal Obligations, and 2) Fard al Kifayah = Communal Obligations. It is the latter obligation which is the most important, as it dictates what Muslims are to do with those who don't do what is right, but instead do what is wrong. If a Muslim refuses to follow these communal obligations, than Allah will abandon them. Lloyd goes into 8 obligations, which are: 1) Muslims must first know what is wrong 2) They must then explain what is wrong to those who don't know 3) They then forbid that which is wrong using slander if need be 4) If the person desists, they then must censor them using harsh words 5) If they still continue, then they must right the wrong with their hands 6) From there they must use Intimidation 7) This is followed by an assault against the person 8) And finally, they can use force if need be These can especially be in the context of going into someone's home and destroying their wine, or any crosses they may find, or destroying any musical instruments they may hear being played; anything Islam considers Haram (forbidden), even in the West. Al Ghazzali, one of Islam's foremost philosophers said, "Commanding the right is the most fundamental of ones' religion, and without it Islam would cease". Even the Qur'an supports it in Surah 3:104, where it "confronts vice and supports virtue". When Muslims say that this can only be carried out in a Muslim context, Lloyd reminds them that it must be done by ALL Muslims, not just those in a Muslim context, which means even Muslims in the West are obliged to carry out these injunctions. He then went into 5 levels of censuring those who do wrong: 1) Explain their wrong to them 2) Tell them that they have wronged 3) revile them, using verbal abuse and hateful language 4) Forcibly stop the act, and 5) Intimidate the person to the point of hitting them with your hands. Lloyd continues that even in the West these injunctions are to be obeyed and followed. Further, it says in Book Q that Muslims are not to inform on other Muslims to the police, or foreign authorities. Ironically, in Book Q it also says that they are to stop the wrong as long as they can win, and they themselves don't get hurt, so that they are obliged to correct what they deem is wrong, providing they don't cause the others to retaliate, and in doing so, hurt them; rather cowardly, don't you think? These injunctions help explain why so many radical Muslims in the West are so aggressive and downright rude and often hateful in public. They aren't interested in appealing to us, or winning us over with a loving witness. They know these texts intimately, and so understand that they are obliged to dominate us, intimidate us, and to eradicate anything they find distasteful, such as Hatun's T-shirt, or her 'Holey' Qur'an. No wonder so many Muslims that we meet in the West come across as such 'jerks'. It's not their fault at all. It is their Shariah law which makes them so aggressive and so impossible to be around. © Pfander Centre for Apologetics - US, 2022 (66,120) Music: "Epic Heroic Conquest" by Musiclfiles, from filmmusic-io