Jonathan McLatchie vs Jonathan Pearce: Do extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence?

'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence' is often used as a maxim by skeptics against modern miracle claims and Biblical miracles. Christian apologist Jonathan McLatchie and atheist blogger Jonathan Pearce debate the 'prior probabilities' involved in miracle claims and the evidence for the resurrection. For Talk About Doubts: https://talkaboutdoubts.com For Jonathan McLatchie: https://jonathanmclatchie.com For Jonathan Pearce: https://onlysky.media/tippling ---- • Get our 'Confident Christianity' course: http://www.premier.org.uk/course • Support us in the USA: http://www.premierinsight.org/unbelievableshow • Rest of the world: https://my.premier.org.uk/donate/donate-unbelievable-2021 • Newsletter: https://www.premier.org.uk/Unbelievablenewsletter • Blog: https://www.premierinsight.org/unbelievable-the-blog • For the podcast: http://www.premierchristianradio.com/Shows/Saturday/Unbelievable • Facebook https://www.facebook.com/PremierUnbelievable • Twitter https://twitter.com/unbelievablejb • Insta https://www.instagram.com/justin.brierley